Great training. But what about the impact?

05 / 10 / 2026
A group of managers walks out of the room energised after an intensive day of training. They leave with a clear model, engaging exercises and a LinkedIn-worthy quote already in mind. Three weeks later, most of that momentum has faded and everyone's back to their old habits. It's a pattern we see in many traditional training days, and it raises a fair question: does training actually lead to lasting behavioural change, or mostly to a pleasant day out?
Opleiding volgen bij Quintessence

Why a single training day rarely sticks

Research on training transfer shows that the training itself isn't the whole story. Participants' motivation and a supportive work environment also shape whether what's learned is actually applied, especially for leadership skills (Blume et al., 2010).

That's no coincidence, because learning is cumulative. A meta-analysis of distributed practice shows that knowledge revisited across several sessions is retained far longer than knowledge delivered in a single block (Cepeda et al., 2006). A one-off training day therefore runs into a structural limit: the brain holds on to what it encounters repeatedly, over time.

Knowing isn't the same as doing

A training day can do an excellent job of transferring knowledge. But knowing something isn't the same as being able to do it. A large-scale meta-analysis of leadership training design (Lacerenza et al., 2017) shows that the very elements a single day lacks are linked to greater behavioural change: a thorough needs analysis, feedback and spaced practice.

In other words, what you offer matters, but how you build it matters just as much.

The step that's most often skipped: reflection

Research on "learning by thinking" shows that people who deliberately take time to reflect after a learning experience perform better than those who simply keep practising (Di Stefano et al., 2014). Reflection isn't a soft extra. It's part of the learning process itself.

The same logic applies to self-awareness. Introspection alone falls short: it's the combination of internal reflection and external feedback that genuinely helps people grow (Eurich, 2018). Without built-in room for reflection, training stays on the surface.

Our conclusion: from training day to learning journey

These insights shape how we design our programmes. We only offer a standalone training day when it's part of a broader journey.

In practice, that means learning journeys built on:

  • a modular structure with a clear thread running through the content
  • an integrated learning process rather than a series of separate days
  • a learning group that goes through the journey together and becomes a group beyond the content itself
  • support before, during and after the programme
  • enough time for reflection and transfer

That asks more of an organisation than blocking out a day in the calendar. But it's exactly that difference that determines whether training becomes a pleasant memory or a lasting change.

Wondering which learning journey fits your organisation's needs? We'd be glad to talk it through. Get in touch via https://www.quintessence.be/en/contact

 

Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010). Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1065–1105.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380.
Di Stefano, G., Gino, F., Pisano, G. P., & Staats, B. R. (2014). Learning by thinking: How reflection aids performance (Working Paper No. 14-093). Harvard Business School.
Eurich, T. (2018). What self-awareness really is (and how to cultivate it). Harvard Business Review.
Lacerenza, C. N., Reyes, D. L., Marlow, S. L., Joseph, D. L., & Salas, E. (2017). Leadership training design, delivery, and implementation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(12), 1686–1718

+32 (0)2 705 28 48